We have read about many pure
and Islamic heroes in our curriculum books, poetry of our national poets and many
other history books written after the partition of Sub-continent. The one and
only great logic which our right wing intellectuals and authors teach us is
that these were the great pious people who actually converted us to Islam as we
were infidels. Have we ever bothered to
research about these so called heroes or explored the belief that they served
Islam? Have these heroes like Muhammad Bin Qasim, Mehmud Ghaznivi, Muhammad
Shahab-Ud- Din Ghori and so many others (unfortunately all are Arabs and Afghanis
and non from our mother land) really converted us to Islam and saved us from
the deepest part of the hell? But unfortunately this is not true and in fact
these are not our heroes but invaders of our mother land.
After the invention of two nation theory and
creation of Pakistan, our so called politicians thought that if we have to
convince our new generation that the Muslims were a single nation in
subcontinent (although majority Muslims of Subcontinent didn’t agree on this)
and Pakistan is a home for Muslims to practice its religion freely and
independently, we have to surpass the nationality based on ethnics and
geography. For that purpose they invented a fabricated Muslim history.These
intellectuals tried their level best to
teach us that these legendary Islamic Heroes actually spread Islam in
Sub-continent which is now a great Muslim nation in the world map. While
fabricating the actual and true history with full patriotism and Islamic mood,
they unfortunately forgot some basic and universal facts which are as under:
·
One of our so called heroes is Sultan Mehmood
Ghaznvi who we believe that, served Islam in subcontinent. Mehmood was an
Afghan warrior who Invaded Multan and killed thousands of Ismailia Muslims (a
branch of Shia Islam). These Shia Muslims were obeying the Fatimid Khilafat of
Egypt. The Fatimid Khilafat was spread in North Africa from Red Sea in the east
to Atlantic Ocean in the west and ultimately made Egypt the center of their Khilafat. They built
Cairo City, Al Azhar University and Al Hakim Mosque in Egypt. They also
patronized some great Muslim scientists like Ibni Al Hytham. After killing the
Shias, Sultan Mehmood established Ghaznvi rule in some parts of subcontinent
and according to our intellectuals this was a great service to Islam.
·
Our second so called great hero is
Shahāb-ud-Din Muhammad Ghori, (we have named one of our Missile with his name).
Our state sponsored historians told us that he was a great servant of Islam in
Sub-continent. But the fact is that, In 1186 AD and 1187 AD Muhammad Ghori
conquered Lahore with the support of a local Hindu ruler, he ended the
Ghaznavid's Islamic rule and established his own. Again Ghori invaded an
Islamic sultanate which was created by one of our hero and established his own
rule and become our hero. Ghaznvis and Ghories were enemies of each other, but
still both were the servant of Islam and are our heroes.
·
Muhammad Bin Qasim was a General of Walid Bin
Abdul Malik, the Umayyad Caliph of Damascus. According to Mubarak Ali a great
historian, the war between Muhammad Bin Qasim and Raja Dhahir of Sind in 712 AD
was not a war of faith. Qasim was a general not an Islamic preacher and he has
invaded Sindh just to expand the Umayyad rule. Mubrak Ali has also mentioned
that the Islam had reached Sindh through
some preachers of Shia Islam before Muhammad Bin Qasim .
·
We have imported heroes not only from Arab
and Afghanistan but from Greece as well. We are proudly declaring Alexander a
great warrior and have given him a Muslim name “Sikander” We never mentioned the bravery of Raja Porus
who was a Punjabi local ruler from Sub-continent and strongly fought with
Alexander to protect his mother land.
I have mentioned a few
examples and there are many more which our political historians forgot to
consider while inventing our Islamic history of subcontinent. Now the question
is why the need of reinventing the history felt? In my opinion there are two
reasons; one is to legitimize the two nation theory and second is to convince
the new generation that the partition was a necessity to secure Islam in
subcontinent.
No comments:
Post a Comment